Category Archives: Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act

Your choices in face of False Domestic Violence Allegations

Posted on by
Reply

The Police:   No matter what, resist saying anything to the police.  If they are there, they are investigating the false complaint.  You may think the threshold is you did something violent–but the Police’s threshold is to establish that you were present and there was mere contact.  The Police will arrest for “grey” areas so they are only looking for plausible proof.  (Think Vallejo Police who may just shoot you for any reason–and this intimidation is something you will need to be ready for.)  The Police rationalize their false arrests as acceptable as you can prove your innocence in Court.  The Police are also under enormous pressure to make arrests–particularly males.   If you want to be proactive and you know your spouse is going to make a false domestic violence claim, you might as well file a complaint first.  For some reason, who ever calls 911 first has a slight edge in “grey” areas.   Do not underestimate the risk of arrest.   While a fist fight in bar may be a misdemeanor, the mere touch and even a bare noticeable scratch equals an arrest for a felony.   (You can thank the National Organization of Women and their surrogates in DOJ, California State Legislature, and lobbyists for this.)    Further, do not assume it will be OK–it will never be OK if you arrested because you will be entered into USDOJ database for domestic violence and for the rest of your life whenever your name is searched you will be tagged…this makes a big difference in getting employment, especially in California.   Essentially, whether you are convicted or guilty matters not, the arrest results in punishment–again thank the National Organization of Women and Senator Barbara Boxer, and Hillary Clinton (while Bill Clinton was President).

So bottom line, resist the urge to tell the Police your side of the story.  With domestic violence they are looking for a reason to make a arrest.  If you must something….say all you remember is that she verbally abused you and attacked you and that is all you remember.  Again, practice it, do not say anything else to the Police–do not make the slightest word slip so they can arrest you.  Be calm, do not raise your voice, use profanity–simply state you have nothing to say without advice of a lawyer or repeat like a parrot she attacked you and thats all you know, beyond that you need a lawyer.   The police officer will probably play games and say if you need a lawyer, you are probably guilty, so if your innoncent…..DO NOT FALL for this line!

The Next Step–  This is tricky and one you will have to face yourself.   They usually put you in County Jail and if you are innocent you are probably terrified and angry.  The District Attorney knows your state of mind.   So the first thing in the morning, you will be offered a choice:  A threat of 5 years in prison for felony (regardless of the underlying facts) or you plead guilty now to a misdemeanor.   And they will sweeten the pot–you can get the misdemeanor expunged in a couple years after probation.   Sounds like a good deal to some.  But what if you are innocent–the Solano District Attorney does not care–most likely some young attorney has been assigned and all she cares about is getting a promotion or her scorecard at this point.  She wants the easy kill–you pleading guilty.  Its your choice.   But if you plead guilty, the rest of world does not care if your record was expunged….there is always a record.   This is an etiquette for the ivory tower lawyers and courts…the rest of world will always know you pleaded guilty.  Try explaining to a future employer…”but the record was expunged.”   And remember your name is already in the USDOJ database forever….so you can never hide the incident.

If you are innocent, you can give the DA the finger and hopefully pay some large bail.   (This is why most people with no money or poor education simply plead guilty.)    If you make bail, the DA will go through the motions of prosecuting you but if the facts are not there, the case will probably be dropped the morning the trial is set to begin.  This is how far the DA plays games, wastes resources, and hurts innocent people.  Unfortunately, the Solano DA is fully on board with the domestic violence witch hunt.  (The DA gets grants from DOJ to support their domestic violence programs through old policy frameworks originated and influenced by Hillary Clinton via Bill Clinton as president in 1990s– DOJ has undocumented policy decisions through biased DOJ managers that gives more grant money to more effective programs (higher male prosecution rates).   I can’t prove this but I heard from what I deem to be a reliable source that this is what happened at least in the 1990s in Solano County.   Many of you father’s out there probably know how the Solano District Attorney was complicity is essentially a witch hunt.

The Trial:  If it appears to be that you may go this route, then you will need a lawyer.   Unfortunately, if you are poor, you will end of with a public defender who does not have time or resources to adequately defend you.  So even if innocent, you have a probability of being convicted.   Most likely whatever you said to the Police officer will be the only real evidence (if you are innocent).

The bottom line is that innocent men have their lives ruined in Solano County because of false allegations.  Because police and the district attorney for political reasons are complicit and happy to have arrests and convictions to show they are doing their job.   There is real support false allegations.  When is the last time the Solano DA prosecuted for a false domestic violence conviction?   The National Organization of Women and all their political surrogates would crucify any actions–the rationale being it deters women from filing genuine complaints.   In doing so, the NOW has created a new Justice system with the assistance of people sworn to protect all people.

Now imagine how all of this looks in family court–you are behind before you even start because of a false allegation.  Solano County Justice sucks.

Elkins v Superior Court, A look inside how the Courts really DON’T make decisions in the best interest of children

Posted on by
Reply

The most obvious lie by the Solano Family Courts:  the decision is in the best interest of the children.   The proof:  look back at the Elkins case (Elkins v. Superior Court, 163 P.3d 160 (Cal. 2007)) which clearly shows that the California Court systems optimized their systems for being able to process cases quickly.  THEY DID NOT OPTIMIZE RULES FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF CHILDREN.

In the Elkins case, not only did the Contra Costa Judge make an idiotic decision, the Judge  denied the rights of the Father also on a technicality.  You will find the Solano County Judges do the same on technicalities when it is convenient, but will cite the best interest of the children (usually by citing the mediators report–Solano hidden justice system).

It is absolutely mind numbing how the Courts and mediators cite the best interest of children to parents, when they cannot possibly be telling the truth.  What they mean is they took a wild ass guess and leaned in the best interest of the children–but the wild ass guess can be far from the best decision for the children; this happens all the time with parental alienation because all cases in Solano County go through a filter of domestic violence because it is the politically correct use of the Court’s time.  (Thank the Violence Against Women Act and the National Organization of Women for this political perversion of fair processes in the Courts.)

This is why the liar, false allegation maker, or the slippery lying lawyer will have the advantage in Family Court.  There is nothing about the truth…its about best showing in short time.  To make it fair, the Courts should tell fathers, they will not investigate lies, false allegations, or punish crafty lawyers who want to play stupid games to win.

(If lawyers, Judges, and mediators can lie….what the hell…everybody should purposely lie….if for no other reason, than to defend yourself.   This is just a .  Lawyers are the only ones arrogant enough to self-rationalize that lying is OK.)

The summary of a task force to deal with the lack of justice because Court were railroading parents is found here:  http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/elkins-executive.pdf.    I think fathers out there know that the Courts are still railroading parents with a factory justice that employs standard stereotypes and instructions that favor the mothers (via mediators who are in turn protected by the Courts; and the mediators protect the Judges–how wonderful–a love fest of independent fairness in the mind of the Courts but in reality a complete failure.)

By the way, the stupid lawyers who made up the Elkins task force decided that part of the solution is to make the children of parents testify.  Most likely the greedy lawyers were thinking of all the extra work to appoint lawyers for children and more paperwork, because you cannot explain this decision as being in the best interest of the children.  Like so much in the family court, processes are in the best interest of the lawyer’s wallet with rhetoric about children as camouflage.  Every parent should think about how stupid it is to make children testify and realize that the idiot lawyers (money and vanity) are driving the out of control madness of the Court systems.  (See CAL. FAM. CODE § 7635  which states:  (a) The child may, if under the age of 12 years, and shall, if 12 years of age or older, be made a party to the action. If the child is a minor and a party to the action, the child shall be represented by a guardian ad litem appointed by the court. The guardian ad litem need not be represented by counsel if the guardian ad litem is a relative of the child.  (b) The natural mother, each man presumed to be the father under Section 7611, and each man alleged to be the natural father, may be made parties and shall be given notice of the action in the manner prescribed in Section 7666 and an opportunity to be heard. )   After reading this, I bet you say the Courts and lawyers are fucking idiots or very smart at creating work for themselves.

Elkins v Superior Court Case on local archive here.

 

Resources for PACA (Parental Alienation Child Abuse) — Please use this term instead of PA and PAS

Posted on by
Reply

I am coining a new phrase and hope all out there will use it.   PACA – Parental Alienation Child Abuse.   Refer to the “Other Voices” page to live PACA so you understand it.  This squarely puts parental alienation as just another form of child abuse which it is.

Superior Court of Solano County — 5 minutes of a video parents are required to watch.   (Alienating parents have no interest in being told the affects of alienation and therefore do not watch.   This satisfies the Solano Court’s systems feeling of duty and is the extent to which the Court will involve itself with Parental Alienation.  It makes the Judges feel good.  I’ll update this if the Court ever takes Parental Alienation Child Abuse seriously.)

http://www.warshak.com                                                                                                     Dr. Warshak is a psychologist and author of Divorce Poison: How To Protect Your Family From Bad-mouthing and Brainwashing, now in its 24th printing, and co-author of the critically acclaimed DVD for children and parents,Welcome Back, Pluto: Understanding, Preventing, and Overcoming Parental Alienation.

Do we need another panel on domestic violence? What about Parental Alienation? Vote Republican this year.

Posted on by
Reply

Solano County forum focuses on family violence prevention

Here we go again….Dr. Ron Chapman with the California Department of Health, Solano Family Court Judge Wendy Getty, Vacaville Police Chief Richard Word and Solano County Supervisor John Vasquez, the forum revolves around reviving the spirit of collaboration within the county.    As the Reporter reports.

Domestic Violence is something that can be seen and is politically popular topic.  It enjoys the support of women’s rights groups.  It enjoys the funding of many government agencies.  It is the focus of every father that passes through the Solano Family Court.

You will not see any such emphasis on parental alienation.  Nor will you see any such forum on the bias within the Courts on this topic.  The fact is that the Courts choose mediators who do not believe parental alienation occurs.  The fact that Judges will look dumbfounded about the topic because they are politically motivated.

The Courts are not about fairness or the law.  The Courts are about the politically correct subject of the day.  You see this in the Court’s obsession with domestic violence with a parallel complete ignorance of parental alienation.  This is purposeful by the Court.  Both forms of abuse are abuse.  But in the Solano Family Court only one form of abuse is considered.

The Solano Family Court and the Judges in the Court system and the mediators they select do not serve fairness with regard to parental alienation.   I hope one day the purposeful bias of the Court and Judges is made known and the biased complacent Judges are replaced.

Until women’s rights groups stop playing with the laws to favor women and at the expense of the best interest of children, parental alienation will never get the attention it should.  Parental alienation is primarily implemented by women–this is why the Court and Judges will not look at the topic or take action….Judges are literally monkey not see, monkey not hear on this topic.

Father’s that know the reality that the Solano Family Court is biased against father’s and serves nothing more than a facade of justice….vote.  And the democratic party is not your friend.  The party of Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer are the reason why the Courts are so biased against fathers.  They are also the reason that the Justice system goes on witch hunts against innocent men for domestic violence.

Perhaps our next president will stop pandering to women’s rights groups.

Comparative Basis As Indicator of Solano District Attorney’s Office Bias against Males with Regard to Domestic Violence

Posted on by
Reply

An example that can be repeated a thousand times over to illustrate the difference between Solano County and Non-feminist ruled country.    (Outside of Senators Boxer and Feinstein territory)

A former Miss New Hampshire was charged with biting, scratching, kicking, and punching her boyfriend.  She was charged with simple assault.  This is a misdemeanor there.

If this had occurred in Solano County and it Miss Newhapshire was a Mister, he would be charged with felony domestic violence and his life would be ruined regardless of the outcome of any trial or proceedings.   The Solano District Attorney’s Office has maintained a 100% prosecution policy for all charges (for males) and they go for the felony charge and will only settle for misdemeanors.

The Solano District Attorney’s Office scored many political points over the years for putting away many bad fathers–the problem is some of those of those fathers were victims of false allegations.  The District Attorney’s Office did not care about false allegations and still does not.

This relates to the Solano Family Court in that such an event of a false allegation would put a father in a bad framework for any child custody evaluation.  Remember that Domestic Violence and Child Support are the biggest things the Court looks at for the best interest of the children (whatever that means).

In many ways, the Solano District Attorney’s Office violated the civil rights of some fathers and behaved no differently than in a witch hunt.  Some of those in that office that knowingly prosecuted or persecuted an innocent father are themselves (the prosecutors from the DA’s office) criminals in my mind.

I hope father’s you note that some Judges on the bench today were in that office at the peak of the witch hunts against males.

See attached Image of Miss New Hampshire arrest article.

Miss New Hampshire Charged with Simple Assault

 

 

Parental Alienation–A topic buried by Women’s rights groups blinded by revenge and not interested in equality

Posted on by
1

Since the women-rights dominated Superior Court of Solano County does not believe or take into account Parental Alienation….you need to look around for information.   Here’s another father’s story and some info….take a read of the short article.    I abstracted their recommended links too.   I think they are worth taking a look at.   By the way, watch out for the ambulance chasing lawyers that advertise themselves as Parental Alienation lawyers…..think ambulance chaser.

This story is from Georgia.     Why is it that the progressive state of California lags Alabama and Georgia and many Countries?   Could it be the women’s rights movement is happy to steam roll men’s rights?   Think about the irony and the sadness.  But it is true California lags in this area because of the strong influence of the most militant core of the women’s rights movement who are not interested in justice.  And it is true, they wield power through Boxer, Feinstein, and Peolsi and many state politicians to ensure that Judges lean the right way.  Until this generation of angry old white women fade away, California will not make progress in Father’s rights.  (Election coming up soon–Vote against all of them)

From the article   bubbles-of-love-in-loganville

“My husband has an 8-year-old daughter he has not seen in going on three years. Due to his case still being handled in court I don’t want to go into too much detail, but his daughter is suffering from and has been diagnosed by two counselors as having Parental Alienation Syndrome. For whatever reason, this innocent child has been talked out of having any kind of positive relationship with her dad, and it has resulted in years of hurt and pain for every party involved,” she wrote in a blog on Patch. “Parental Alienation, to keep it short, is basically when one parent tries to create a negative relationship between a child they share with the other parent. This can be done by talking negatively about the other parent in front of their child, making the child fear the other parent, bringing the child into adult discussions concerning the other parent, and the list goes on and on.”

http://www.paawareness.org/

http://www.parental-alienation-awareness.com/

http://www.bubblesofloveday.com/home.asp

 

 

Fathers: Now is the time to write Congress Regarding the Violence Against Women Act reauthorization bill

Posted on by
Reply

Please read about this bill and do your own research.  This is the heart that pumps blood of gender bias into the Courts.

You can track bill S. 1925: Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2011 using the link.

The National Organization of Women characterize the debate as a war on women.   I characterize the NOW as being lead by women who want revenge not justice.

For a slightly different perspective on the NOW perspective of Biden: Renew My Bill Or More Men Will Beat Up Women go to the link.

The Act’s original intent was hijacked by women’s rights groups and used to persecute many innocent men.  I am sure many guilty men were also punished.   But in this country we have a right for our institutions to act prudently and not work behind closed doors.  In many way, radical women’s rights groups have acted no differently than many fascists regimes throughout history.   Many of you know that in Solano County that District Attorney’s Office and Police organizations jumped on the persecution band wagon because of Federal money received in return.

It many not help, but you can at least go on record and demand meaningful reform to the bill to actually go after the guilty only and to punish false allegations.

The Courts, District Attorney, and Police will not do this because they have been bought or have self-justified the ends justifies the means.

If even one innocent person is prosecuted intentionally so that nine guilty will not be let free, then the system failed in my mind.  And I hope you fathers out there will agree and agree that this is unconstitutional.

Do not let the rhetoric of you are pro-domestic violence if you are pro-reform deter you.   This is the path for politicians (including political judges, political district attorney, and political police).

Unfortunately, we have Senators Boxer and Feinstein who really don’t give a damn because they are for prosecuting one innocent man if it means that nine guilty will not be set free.   Our California Senators and Representatives are the underpinning of this distorted perverse justice system.

I will set up an automated letter signing campaign and with a link in the near future.