So as Judge Bowers did not put out enough bad to carry the torch for Solano County, Judge Seeman win the bad Judge torch fair and square.   But in the bigger picture, Solano County Superior Court Judge XXX who was banging the Zodiac Killer’s wife and obstructed investigations, may very well be the permanent bad torch carrier.   Who was Judge XXX?   For now here is short part of the Judge Seeman accusations.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ,
WILEY W. MANUEL COURTHOUSE

JUN 14, 2012

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA  v. (Judge) PAUL DAVID SEEMAN

COMPLAINT  579641

PFN:  DRG318

CEN:  2330179

The Undersigned, being sworn says, on Information and belief, that PAUL DAVID SEEMAN did, in the County of Alameda, State of California, between January 27,1999 and June 13,2012, commit a Felony, to wit:  THEFT FROM ELDER OR DEPENDENT ADULT, a violation of section 368(d) of the PENAL CODE of California, in that said defendant(s) committed theft and embezzlement with respect to the property of an elder
and dependent adult, said property having a value exceeding $950.00, and knew and reasonably should have known that said person, ANN C NUTTING, was an elder and dependent adult.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS-LATE DISCOVERY CLAUSE AS TO DEFENDANT SEEMAN
It is further alleged as to count one, that the above violation is an offense described in subdivision (c) of Section 803 and that said offense was not discovered until March 24, 2010.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS-LATE DISCOVERY CLAUSE AS TO DEFENDANT SEEMAN
It is further alleged as to count one, that the above violation is an offense described in subdivision (c) of Section 803 and that said offense was not discovered until March 24, 2010.

SPEC ALLEG – NOTICE OF STATE PRISON ELIGIBILITY CLAUSE AS TO DEFENDANT
SEEMAN  The defendant is hereby notified that the above felony offense is not governed by Penal Code section 1170(h) and that an executed sentence for the offenses herein charged shall be served in the state prison pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.1 (a).

EXCESSIVE LOSS OVER $200,000 CLAUSE AS TO DEFENDANT SEEMAN
It is further alleged as to count one, that in the commission of the above offense(s) the said defendant PAUL DAVID SEEMAN, with the intent to do so, took, damaged and destroyed property of a value exceeding $200,000, within the meaning of Penal Code Section 12022.6(a)(2)).

SECOND COUNT  The Undersigned further deposes and says on Information and belief, that said PAUL DAVID SEEMAN did, in the County of Alameda, State of California, on or about August 11,2004, commit a Felony, to wit: PERJURY BY DECLARATION, a violation of section 118(a) of the PENAL CODE of California, in that said defendant(s) did unlawfully, under penalty of perjury, declare as true, that which was known to be false, to wit: untrue declarations failing to disclose a loan from an individual and real estate investments, and income, required to be reported annually by a California Court Commissioner or Judge to the Fair Political Practices Commission.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS-LATE DISCOVERY CLAUSE AS TO DEFENDANT SEEMAN
It is further alleged as to count two, that the above violation is an offense described in subdivision (c) of Section 803 and that said offense was not discovered until March 24, 2010.

THIRD COUNT
The Undersigned further deposes and says on Information and belief, that said PAUL DAVID SEEMAN did, in the County of Alameda, State of California, on or about February 25,2005, commit a Felony, to wit: PERJURY BY DECLARATION, a violation of section 118(a) of the PENAL CODE of California, in that said defendant(s) did unlawfully, under penalty of perjury, declare as true, that which was known to be false, to wit:
untrue declarations failing to disclose a loan from an individual and real estate investments, and income, required to be reported annually by a California Court Commissioner or Judge to the Fair Political Practices Commission.
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS-LATE DISCOVERY CLAUSE AS TO DEFENDANT SEEMAN
It is further alleged as to count three, that the above violation is an offense described in subdivision (c) of Section 803 and that said offense was not discovered until March 24, 2010.