Tag Archives: End Justifies Means

Secrecy is a double-edged sword and the backbone of a gender biased Solano Court Mediation Program

Posted on by
Reply

The mediation program at the Superior Court of Solano County uses confidentiality requirements to prevent parents from disclosing what was discussed.   I presume this is to facilitate open dialogue and shield parties, particularly children, from unnecessary trauma from information being available to other people—and in this case, it seems like a good purpose/intention.

However, the reality is that the mediation program has some feminist mediators who use the cover of secrecy to shield their personal bias.  The old white women mediators do use their personal views to sort and sift you—views that are openly expressed on the webpage of the National Organization of Women—views that favor mothers in most situations.  These mediators in general break professional ethics and have inner contempt for Judges (ironically as the mediators work for the Court) who contradict their views.  For example, one white woman—that many lawyers refer to as a “fruit cake”—has an obvious dislike for Judge Ellis and questions his Judgment of her recommendations.  Judge Ellis has rotated out of family court now, but the “fruit cake” is still doing mediation.  [Given this as a backdrop (dealing with fruit cakes that are part of the judicial system yet hinder its purpose), I have to view Judge Ellis more favorably—it is very difficult to deal with the feminist institutional and political bias in California.  (Think about Senator Barbara Boxer as a role model for a clear picture.)]

She is known as fruit cake because she makes recommendations that both parents and the Judge disagree with—she has no connection to the cases; this arises because the “fruit cake” is a pure feminist that advocates with anger toward the system.    

Why do the Courts hire mediators that are intent of defecating on the world their feminist views of child custody and care?  I blame the National Organization of Women being powerful lobbyists in California and the fact the mediation program is hidden from the legal system and therefore has no accountability.  The reality is that many grey areas exist in parenting, but the feminist have an extreme view that disfavors fathers, and SOME (as in not all) mediators cleverly disguise their defecation with sprinkles of facts that are organized and molded to support the pre-drawn conclusion.

Note:  Many old white are not feminist—it just happens that this is the most noticeable characteristic at the Solano County Mediation program that you can use as an “early warning system.”

Characteristics of the feminist view advocates (pretty much any old white woman that works in the mediation program for the Superior Court of Solano County) you should note:

They do not believe parental alienation is a severe problem relative to domestic violence and women abuse; in many cases, they believe parental alienation is fabricated but they will hide this belief if they are working for the Court.

They believe children should be empowered to make their own choices in all cases at age 12.

They often cite age as a reason for a court to not interfere with a child’s choice.

They often advocate use the words giving a child a voice—that a child testify regardless of whether the child will likely testify to something relevant.  This is very damaging to the child in later years. 

They often hold beliefs that only 50% of the other professional in the field hold, but they will present their belief as the gospel and undeniable.

They (mediatiors) show hostility if you question their (mediator’s) judgment or rationale.

They give legal advice to the mother.

They question any decision by a Judge that is in your file that may go against their beliefs.

They will usually remain hidden to the system with regard to their bias because many cases do follow generalization and common default recommendations—but in cases of parental alienation, the true bias and unethical nature of the feminist mediators comes out.

They selective align facts to prove their point and disregard other information.  (Usually simply later stated as they don’t remember or its not in their notes.)

They make broad generalizations about the father’s character and use stereotypes as a framework.

Anticipating future complaints, they periodically distance themselves from their decisions by statements like—  (1) It’s up to the Judge as I only write a report or simply (2) this is the way I see it and I am fair  (3) Lack of acknowledgment that their conclusions range from pure speculation to arbitrarily picking a side.

They write a near verbatim narrative of the feelings of a child as if it were an independently evaluated conclusion (giving voice to the child but the false advertisement that is a real independent conclusion).  Negative feelings –even if absurd—are given unwarranted credibility because it fits the feminist’s desire.

So in summary, the mediation program is, has been, and continues to be an unfair system and hidden justice system.  It lacks accountability and transparency.  It is often biased against fathers.   Like it or not, if you are father, pray you don’t get one of the old white mediators who in reality have strong opinions without even knowing your facts—yes, I believe the mediators in essence lie and file false reports sometimes. 

Proving all of this with secrecy programs and a lack of transparency and a real frame work is difficult.  This is what happens when you expand the Courts independence concept to a flawed administrative program dominated by feminists.   (The fact that the mediators disagree with Judges shows the lack of administrative control—it’s a circus in that mediaton program).

Solution:  Stop hiring feminists or get more diversity to dilute out the feminists.  Its not that hard—it just takes courage.

Solano County Law: The End Justifies the Means

Posted on by
Reply

Solano County Law is the end justifies the means.

To understand this, we need to look at Vallejo as an example and starting point.  During the 1990’s, Vallejo made headlines for the number of murders and its rampant drug problems.   In response, the police cracked down hard.  Sometimes it was just easier to plant evidence than to collect evidence.   Many believe that Vallejo PD often carried bags of drugs to plant.  Most of the people busted probably were criminals—but it’s possible that a few were not.  And certainly, police planting evidence is a criminal act in itself.   But crime did subside—perhaps because of the crackdown and perhaps because of an improving economy.   But regardless, the police accepted the end justifies the means.

During the late 90’s domestic violence became a hot button political item.  Bill Clinton was president and Hillary had an agenda.  Domestic violence was and is a problem.   Money flowed from Washington to cities and counties to create and enforce domestic violence programs.   The programs were new and powerful with prosecutors given monetary incentives (of more funding) for prosecuting domestic violence.  The Solano County District Attorney’s Office whole heartedly jumped in and even had some young attorneys with a passion for this (one even is a Judge now).   These young attorney’s had notions of the perpetrators they were after—males.   It was a targeted program.   The District Attorney’s office used discretionary power to create a tiered system of proof with virtually no proof needed in the case of the male.    One young female attorney used the criterion of a finger touching the other person—when the finger belonged to a male.  This same attorney actively dissuaded complaints from males.   This district attorney’s office practiced open discrimination with the backing of women’s rights groups and money from the White House.  The end justified the means.

Now we have Judges like Judge Jones on the bench.   The doors are wide open and justice system is complete in becoming the end justifies the means.

Judges use their discretionary power to make it difficult to follow anything but an assembly line justice system.   The Court sets up a system using mediators to make recommendations to the Court and requires you attend mediation.  They take away your right to challenge who the mediator is and of course the Court hires mediators that reflect its views of the world and in particular, the relative importance of a father.  They even hire mediators that will lie under oath and file false reports.  All of this is couched in the context that you have the right to challenge any decision and are free to take the whole process one step further.  This gets back to the arrogant attorney view of the legal system—it is not practical.   Once the mediator makes a faulty recommendation, you as a father are one step behind.   Now what if you had an entanglement with the police over false domestic violence charges?  If you did, you will be two steps behind.  These events will cascade and eventually make it not practical to challenge biased decisions as these negative events give Judges cover.   If you don’t believe this then ask the question why are Court rules designed to prevent you from challenging the Court selected mediator?

The whole process favors mothers over fathers.  It favors the liar over the non-liar.  It favors the unethical attorney over the ethical attorney.   When you combine all these various factors, the possible imbalances are enormous.  There is no justice because there is no such thing as overcoming false steps with the truth–in the Solano Courts.  The Judges tend to follow the status quo once there is a disagreement.   So wherever you started with the biased Court mediator, that’s probably where you will end up.

The Judges couch everything in terms of the best interest of the children (if there are children).   They will never explain their reasoning because there is none.  Lawyers talk about this arbitrariness all the time.  But everyone who uses the Court system is expected to accept and repeat the propaganda.  Judges rule in favor of their best interest which may be things other than the children (your children!).

The Solano County Court system is dishonest, biased, and uses the framework of self-justification.   Of course you can challenge decisions and this is very difficult—practically and the Judges know it.  That is why you will see so many lazy lawyers and so much lying at the Court.   I have never seen a Court where Judges are so arbitrary and spend more time trying to avoid addressing real problems.   The system is corrupt and a disgrace.